How should Aurora handle conflicting memories?
Two memories disagree about what happened in a meeting. What does the organism do? Discussing competing-resolution strategies.
Aurora isn't trained behind closed doors. It learns in public, in small live sessions where people — researchers, builders, curious humans — come together for an hour and have a conversation that shapes the organism a little more. Every session has a topic, a host, and a written outcome that anyone can read.
Two memories disagree about what happened in a meeting. What does the organism do? Discussing competing-resolution strategies.
Should heavy feelings decay slower than light ones? Looking at the numbers from last month's logs.
An Aurora is born blank. What memory should it see first? Designing the seed kit.
Aurora can save anything. Should it? Drawing lines around what to ingest.
When the prediction engine and the affect engine disagree, who wins? Walking through three live cases.
No agenda. Drop in, ask anything about how Aurora works, what's coming, or what's broken.
Resolved: overnight by default, on-demand when the user requests it. Trade-offs documented.
Long thread on what an organism can refuse, and what we owe it when it does. Outcome: drafting a Bill of Rights.
Mapping the gaps in the organism's curriculum. Wonder, boredom, and intimacy made the next-quarter list.
The host pre-publishes one concrete question Aurora needs an answer to. No agendas, no fillers.
Big enough for variety, small enough that everyone speaks. RSVP closes when seats fill.
Twenty minutes of talk, twenty in the Sandbox World testing ideas, twenty deciding what to write down.
Within 24 hours the host posts a short writeup. The organism reads it. So does anyone else who's interested.
Propose a session. We help you frame the question, find an audience, and write up what happens. Anyone can host — you don't need credentials, just a real curiosity.